trackrev.io

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

• Arrow-terminated links weak +2 pts
  COPY_ARROW_LINKS · content

  Several links or buttons end with an arrow. This is frequent in generated pages but is a widespread convention, so it is only a weak hint.

  arrow_links:

  4

• Decorative numbered labels weak +2 pts
  COPY_NUMBERED_LABELS · content

  The page uses decorative numbered labels like 01 / 02 / 03. Generated designs use them often, but so do many designers, so this is only a weak hint.

  labels:

  ["01","02","03","04","05"]

• Classic landing page structure weak +2 pts
  UI_HERO_FEATURES_TESTIMONIAL_CTA · design

  The page follows the classic hero / features / testimonials / call-to-action layout. Generated landing pages use it a lot, but it is the standard marketing layout, so this is only a weak hint.

  blocks:

  ["hero","features","faq","cta"]

• Repeated rounded cards with shadows weak +1 pt
  UI_REPEATED_ROUNDED_CARDS · design

  The markup repeats rounded "card" elements with shadows or borders. This pattern is common in generated landing pages but equally common in hand-made and template sites, so it is only a weak hint.

  css_rules:

  0

  card_like_elements:

  23

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

• Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
  TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

  The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["Vercel response header","Server: Vercel"]

• Uses Lucide icons context 0 pts
  TECH_LUCIDE · technology

  The static HTML suggests Lucide icons. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["59 SVG icons with lucide classes"]

• Uses Next.js context 0 pts
  TECH_NEXT · technology

  The static HTML suggests Next.js. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["asset path: /_next/static/chunks/fbf63d3a-609a61cda8ecfc0e.js","App Router flight data"]

• Uses React context 0 pts
  TECH_REACT · technology

  The static HTML suggests React. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["Next.js runtime (React based)","React runtime bootstrap in inline script"]

• Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 pts
  TECH_TAILWIND · technology

  The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["287 distinct Tailwind-style utility classes","tailwindcss banner in CSS"]

• Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
  LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

  Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

  technologies:

  ["TECH_LUCIDE","TECH_NEXT","TECH_REACT","TECH_TAILWIND"]