talabat.com

Visit talabat.com ↗ Food & Drink

AI signal score

0/ 100

Insufficient evidence

This is an experimental heuristic score, not proof of how a site was made. A score of 0 means no relevant signals were detected — not that the site is human-coded.

Last checked
(1 hour ago)
Rescan available in 22 hours 41 minutes

AI-related evidence

0

No AI-related patterns matched. That's not proof either way.

Technology context

4

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

  • Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
    TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

    The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["Cloudflare response header","Server: Cloudflare"]
  • Uses Next.js context 0 pts
    TECH_NEXT · technology

    The static HTML suggests Next.js. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["asset path: https://prod-website-cdn-2.talabat.com/fc544baa64032316b716d11690899c67dba4bf29/_next/static/chunks/polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js","__NEXT_DATA__ script"]
  • Uses React context 0 pts
    TECH_REACT · technology

    The static HTML suggests React. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["data-reactroot attribute","Next.js runtime (React based)"]
  • Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 pts
    TECH_TAILWIND · technology

    The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["25 distinct Tailwind-style utility classes"]

Limitations of this scan

2
  • Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
    LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

    Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

    technologies:
    ["TECH_NEXT","TECH_REACT","TECH_TAILWIND"]
  • Too little evidence context 0 pts
    LIMIT_TOO_LITTLE_EVIDENCE · constraint

    There was too little to analyze, or no specific signal matched. This does not mean the site was written by hand; it only means the public homepage gives no usable evidence either way.

    elements:
    388
    scoring_signals:
    0
    visible_text_chars:
    1693

Is this your website? Request removal