tailwindcss.com
AI signal score
4/ 100
Weak hints only
This is an experimental heuristic score, not proof of how a site was made.
- Last checked
- (1 hour ago)
AI-related evidence
3Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.
-
Blur / glass effects weak +2 ptsUI_BLUR_GLASS · design
The markup combines backdrop blur with translucent backgrounds. Generated pages use this often, but so do many designers, so it is only a weak hint.
- css_backdrop_filter:
- false
- blur_translucent_elements:
- 2
-
Popular gradient styling weak +2 ptsUI_GENERIC_GRADIENT · design
The page uses popular gradient styles (for example purple-to-blue or gradient text). They often appear in generated designs but are a long-standing design trend, so this is only a weak hint.
- signals:
- ["2 purple/indigo/blue gradient backgrounds"]
-
Repeated rounded cards with shadows weak 0 ptsUI_REPEATED_ROUNDED_CARDS · design
The markup repeats rounded "card" elements with shadows or borders. This pattern is common in generated landing pages but equally common in hand-made and template sites, so it is only a weak hint.
- css_rules:
- 0
- points_before_cap:
- 1
- card_like_elements:
- 9
Technology context
4Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.
-
Hosting / CDN hint context 0 ptsTECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology
The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["Vercel response header","Cloudflare response header","Server: Cloudflare"]
-
Uses Next.js context 0 ptsTECH_NEXT · technology
The static HTML suggests Next.js. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["asset path: /_next/static/chunks/0srs2cqqpk188.js","App Router flight data","X-Powered-By: Next.js"]
-
Uses React context 0 ptsTECH_REACT · technology
The static HTML suggests React. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["Next.js runtime (React based)","React runtime bootstrap in inline script"]
-
Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 ptsTECH_TAILWIND · technology
The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["316 distinct Tailwind-style utility classes","--tw-* custom properties in CSS"]
Limitations of this scan
1-
Only a common tech stack context 0 ptsLIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint
Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.
- technologies:
- ["TECH_NEXT","TECH_REACT","TECH_TAILWIND"]