supaboard.ai

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

• Arrow-terminated links weak +2 pts
  COPY_ARROW_LINKS · content

  Several links or buttons end with an arrow. This is frequent in generated pages but is a widespread convention, so it is only a weak hint.

  arrow_links:

  16

• Classic landing page structure weak +2 pts
  UI_HERO_FEATURES_TESTIMONIAL_CTA · design

  The page follows the classic hero / features / testimonials / call-to-action layout. Generated landing pages use it a lot, but it is the standard marketing layout, so this is only a weak hint.

  blocks:

  ["hero","features","testimonials","cta"]

• Repeated rounded cards with shadows weak +1 pt
  UI_REPEATED_ROUNDED_CARDS · design

  The markup repeats rounded "card" elements with shadows or borders. This pattern is common in generated landing pages but equally common in hand-made and template sites, so it is only a weak hint.

  css_rules:

  14

  card_like_elements:

  1

• Uniform section rhythm weak +1 pt
  UI_SAME_SECTION_RHYTHM · design

  Many page sections repeat nearly identical markup. Generated landing pages often do this, but so does any consistent component-based design, so this is only a weak hint.

  sections:

  12

  points_before_cap:

  2

  largest_repeated_group:

  9

• Stock Tailwind class combinations weak +1 pt
  UI_STOCK_TAILWIND_COMBOS · design

  Several stock Tailwind class combinations appear in the markup. They come from documentation and templates and are used by people and generators alike, so this is a very weak hint.

  combinations:

  ["flex items-center justify-center","grid md:grid-cols-3","py-20 / py-24 sections"]

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

• Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
  TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

  The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["Cloudflare response header","Server: Cloudflare"]

• Uses Lucide icons context 0 pts
  TECH_LUCIDE · technology

  The static HTML suggests Lucide icons. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["23 SVG icons with lucide classes"]

• Uses Next.js context 0 pts
  TECH_NEXT · technology

  The static HTML suggests Next.js. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["asset path: /_next/static/chunks/2h1n4wdds9a3s.js","App Router flight data","X-Powered-By: Next.js"]

• Uses React context 0 pts
  TECH_REACT · technology

  The static HTML suggests React. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["Next.js runtime (React based)","React runtime bootstrap in inline script"]

• Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 pts
  TECH_TAILWIND · technology

  The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["154 distinct Tailwind-style utility classes","--tw-* custom properties in CSS"]

• Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
  LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

  Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

  technologies:

  ["TECH_LUCIDE","TECH_NEXT","TECH_REACT","TECH_TAILWIND"]