rork.com

AI signal score

3/ 100

Weak hints only

This is an experimental heuristic score, not proof of how a site was made.

Last checked
(1 hour ago)
Rescan available in 22 hours 33 minutes

AI-related evidence

2

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

  • Untouched shadcn/ui default theme weak +2 pts
    SCAF_SHADCN_DEFAULT_THEME · design

    The stylesheet still uses the default shadcn/ui theme values. Builder templates ship them and are often left unchanged; hand-made projects that skipped theming do the same.

    signals:
    ["default chart color"]
  • Repeated rounded cards with shadows weak +1 pt
    UI_REPEATED_ROUNDED_CARDS · design

    The markup repeats rounded "card" elements with shadows or borders. This pattern is common in generated landing pages but equally common in hand-made and template sites, so it is only a weak hint.

    css_rules:
    0
    card_like_elements:
    4

Technology context

5

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

  • Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
    TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

    The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["Vercel response header","Cloudflare response header","Server: Cloudflare"]
  • Uses Next.js context 0 pts
    TECH_NEXT · technology

    The static HTML suggests Next.js. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["asset path: /_next/static/immutable/chunks/2cmljnk_oy3i4.js","App Router flight data"]
  • Uses React context 0 pts
    TECH_REACT · technology

    The static HTML suggests React. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["Next.js runtime (React based)","React runtime bootstrap in inline script"]
  • Uses shadcn/ui or Radix UI context 0 pts
    TECH_SHADCN_RADIX · technology

    The static HTML suggests shadcn/ui or Radix UI. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["shadcn/ui theme tokens: bg-background, text-foreground, text-muted-foreground, bg-card, focus-visible:ring-ring"]
  • Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 pts
    TECH_TAILWIND · technology

    The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["129 distinct Tailwind-style utility classes","--tw-* custom properties in CSS"]

Limitations of this scan

1
  • Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
    LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

    Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

    technologies:
    ["TECH_NEXT","TECH_REACT","TECH_SHADCN_RADIX","TECH_TAILWIND"]

Is this your website? Request removal