privos.ai

Visit privos.ai ↗ SaaS / Productivity

AI signal score

6/ 100

Weak hints only

This is an experimental heuristic score, not proof of how a site was made.

Last checked
(2 hours ago)
Rescan available in 21 hours 51 minutes

AI-related evidence

5

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

  • Blur / glass effects weak +2 pts
    UI_BLUR_GLASS · design

    The markup combines backdrop blur with translucent backgrounds. Generated pages use this often, but so do many designers, so it is only a weak hint.

    css_backdrop_filter:
    true
    blur_translucent_elements:
    2
  • Popular gradient styling weak +2 pts
    UI_GENERIC_GRADIENT · design

    The page uses popular gradient styles (for example purple-to-blue or gradient text). They often appear in generated designs but are a long-standing design trend, so this is only a weak hint.

    signals:
    ["purple/indigo linear-gradients in CSS"]
  • Uniform section rhythm weak +2 pts
    UI_SAME_SECTION_RHYTHM · design

    Many page sections repeat nearly identical markup. Generated landing pages often do this, but so does any consistent component-based design, so this is only a weak hint.

    sections:
    11
    largest_repeated_group:
    7
  • Repeated rounded cards with shadows weak 0 pts
    UI_REPEATED_ROUNDED_CARDS · design

    The markup repeats rounded "card" elements with shadows or borders. This pattern is common in generated landing pages but equally common in hand-made and template sites, so it is only a weak hint.

    css_rules:
    23
    points_before_cap:
    1
    card_like_elements:
    13
  • Stock Tailwind class combinations weak 0 pts
    UI_STOCK_TAILWIND_COMBOS · design

    Several stock Tailwind class combinations appear in the markup. They come from documentation and templates and are used by people and generators alike, so this is a very weak hint.

    combinations:
    ["flex items-center justify-center","max-w-7xl mx-auto","container mx-auto px-4","py-20 / py-24 sections"]
    points_before_cap:
    1

Technology context

3

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

  • Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
    TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

    The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["Cloudflare response header","Server: Cloudflare"]
  • Uses React context 0 pts
    TECH_REACT · technology

    The static HTML suggests React. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["React script: /landing-assets/e83f93ffad10709ca1f7fd6c7b5111c1f852dfc702caf3bf62a2038585d7ab94/js/security-react-replacement.js"]
  • Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 pts
    TECH_TAILWIND · technology

    The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["157 distinct Tailwind-style utility classes","Tailwind Play CDN script"]

Limitations of this scan

1
  • Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
    LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

    Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

    technologies:
    ["TECH_REACT","TECH_TAILWIND"]

Is this your website? Request removal