nimbalyst.com

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

• Repeated rounded cards with shadows weak +1 pt
  UI_REPEATED_ROUNDED_CARDS · design

  The markup repeats rounded "card" elements with shadows or borders. This pattern is common in generated landing pages but equally common in hand-made and template sites, so it is only a weak hint.

  css_rules:

  0

  card_like_elements:

  12

• Stock Tailwind class combinations weak +1 pt
  UI_STOCK_TAILWIND_COMBOS · design

  Several stock Tailwind class combinations appear in the markup. They come from documentation and templates and are used by people and generators alike, so this is a very weak hint.

  combinations:

  ["flex items-center justify-center","max-w-7xl mx-auto","grid md:grid-cols-3"]

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

• Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
  TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

  The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["Cloudflare response header","Server: Cloudflare"]

• Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 pts
  TECH_TAILWIND · technology

  The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["125 distinct Tailwind-style utility classes","tailwindcss banner in CSS"]

• Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
  LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

  Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

  technologies:

  ["TECH_TAILWIND"]