ilha.app

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

• Uniform section rhythm weak +2 pts
  UI_SAME_SECTION_RHYTHM · design

  Many page sections repeat nearly identical markup. Generated landing pages often do this, but so does any consistent component-based design, so this is only a weak hint.

  sections:

  8

  largest_repeated_group:

  5

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

• Uses Next.js context 0 pts
  TECH_NEXT · technology

  The static HTML suggests Next.js. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["asset path: /_next/static/chunks/40s9_agndh2zd.js","App Router flight data"]

• Uses React context 0 pts
  TECH_REACT · technology

  The static HTML suggests React. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["Next.js runtime (React based)","React runtime bootstrap in inline script"]

• Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 pts
  TECH_TAILWIND · technology

  The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["121 distinct Tailwind-style utility classes","--tw-* custom properties in CSS"]

• Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
  LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

  Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

  technologies:

  ["TECH_NEXT","TECH_REACT","TECH_TAILWIND"]