hostinger.com

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

• Classic landing page structure weak +2 pts
  UI_HERO_FEATURES_TESTIMONIAL_CTA · design

  The page follows the classic hero / features / testimonials / call-to-action layout. Generated landing pages use it a lot, but it is the standard marketing layout, so this is only a weak hint.

  blocks:

  ["hero","testimonials","pricing","faq"]

• Uniform section rhythm weak +1 pt
  UI_SAME_SECTION_RHYTHM · design

  Many page sections repeat nearly identical markup. Generated landing pages often do this, but so does any consistent component-based design, so this is only a weak hint.

  sections:

  20

  points_before_cap:

  2

  largest_repeated_group:

  10

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

• Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
  TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

  The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["Cloudflare response header","Server: Cloudflare"]

• Uses Vue / Nuxt context 0 pts
  TECH_VUE · technology

  The static HTML suggests Vue / Nuxt. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["scoped-style data-v-* attributes","Nuxt asset path: /_nuxt/BS707jSQ.js","Nuxt state script"]

• Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
  LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

  Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

  technologies:

  ["TECH_VUE"]