hibi.garden

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

• Classic landing page structure weak +2 pts
  UI_HERO_FEATURES_TESTIMONIAL_CTA · design

  The page follows the classic hero / features / testimonials / call-to-action layout. Generated landing pages use it a lot, but it is the standard marketing layout, so this is only a weak hint.

  blocks:

  ["hero","features","faq","cta"]

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

• Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
  TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

  The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["Vercel response header","Server: Vercel"]

• Uses Vite context 0 pts
  TECH_VITE · technology

  The static HTML suggests Vite. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["modulepreload of hashed asset: /assets/file-text-DoitjxzE.js"]

• Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
  LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

  Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

  technologies:

  ["TECH_VITE"]