exa.ai

AI signal score

5/ 100

Weak hints only

This is an experimental heuristic score, not proof of how a site was made.

Last checked
(1 hour ago)
Rescan available in 22 hours 2 minutes

AI-related evidence

3

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

  • Arrow-terminated links weak +2 pts
    COPY_ARROW_LINKS · content

    Several links or buttons end with an arrow. This is frequent in generated pages but is a widespread convention, so it is only a weak hint.

    arrow_links:
    11
  • Uniform section rhythm weak +2 pts
    UI_SAME_SECTION_RHYTHM · design

    Many page sections repeat nearly identical markup. Generated landing pages often do this, but so does any consistent component-based design, so this is only a weak hint.

    sections:
    5
    largest_repeated_group:
    4
  • Stock Tailwind class combinations weak +1 pt
    UI_STOCK_TAILWIND_COMBOS · design

    Several stock Tailwind class combinations appear in the markup. They come from documentation and templates and are used by people and generators alike, so this is a very weak hint.

    combinations:
    ["flex items-center justify-center","max-w-7xl mx-auto","grid md:grid-cols-3"]

Technology context

5

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

  • Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
    TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

    The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["Vercel response header","Server: Vercel"]
  • Uses Lucide icons context 0 pts
    TECH_LUCIDE · technology

    The static HTML suggests Lucide icons. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["14 SVG icons with lucide classes"]
  • Uses Next.js context 0 pts
    TECH_NEXT · technology

    The static HTML suggests Next.js. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["asset path: /_next/static/chunks/8df046ea-d6357a05c42e86cd.js","App Router flight data"]
  • Uses React context 0 pts
    TECH_REACT · technology

    The static HTML suggests React. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["Next.js runtime (React based)","React runtime bootstrap in inline script"]
  • Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 pts
    TECH_TAILWIND · technology

    The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["258 distinct Tailwind-style utility classes","tailwindcss banner in CSS"]

Limitations of this scan

1
  • Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
    LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

    Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

    technologies:
    ["TECH_LUCIDE","TECH_NEXT","TECH_REACT","TECH_TAILWIND"]

Is this your website? Request removal