design.com

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

• Uniform section rhythm weak +2 pts
  UI_SAME_SECTION_RHYTHM · design

  Many page sections repeat nearly identical markup. Generated landing pages often do this, but so does any consistent component-based design, so this is only a weak hint.

  sections:

  57

  largest_repeated_group:

  54

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

• Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
  TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

  The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["Amazon CloudFront response header"]

• Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 pts
  TECH_TAILWIND · technology

  The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["--tw-* custom properties in CSS"]

• Uses Vue / Nuxt context 0 pts
  TECH_VUE · technology

  The static HTML suggests Vue / Nuxt. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["scoped-style data-v-* attributes","Nuxt asset path: /_nuxt/entry.JZ-jEKRR.js","Nuxt state script"]

• Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
  LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

  Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

  technologies:

  ["TECH_TAILWIND","TECH_VUE"]