composio.dev
AI signal score
8/ 100
Weak hints only
This is an experimental heuristic score, not proof of how a site was made.
- Last checked
- (2 hours ago)
AI-related evidence
5Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.
-
Untouched shadcn/ui default theme weak +2 ptsSCAF_SHADCN_DEFAULT_THEME · design
The stylesheet still uses the default shadcn/ui theme values. Builder templates ship them and are often left unchanged; hand-made projects that skipped theming do the same.
- signals:
- ["v4 default tokens"]
-
Blur / glass effects weak +2 ptsUI_BLUR_GLASS · design
The markup combines backdrop blur with translucent backgrounds. Generated pages use this often, but so do many designers, so it is only a weak hint.
- css_backdrop_filter:
- false
- blur_translucent_elements:
- 4
-
Uniform section rhythm weak +2 ptsUI_SAME_SECTION_RHYTHM · design
Many page sections repeat nearly identical markup. Generated landing pages often do this, but so does any consistent component-based design, so this is only a weak hint.
- sections:
- 18
- largest_repeated_group:
- 13
-
Repeated rounded cards with shadows weak +1 ptUI_REPEATED_ROUNDED_CARDS · design
The markup repeats rounded "card" elements with shadows or borders. This pattern is common in generated landing pages but equally common in hand-made and template sites, so it is only a weak hint.
- css_rules:
- 0
- card_like_elements:
- 54
-
Stock Tailwind class combinations weak +1 ptUI_STOCK_TAILWIND_COMBOS · design
Several stock Tailwind class combinations appear in the markup. They come from documentation and templates and are used by people and generators alike, so this is a very weak hint.
- combinations:
- ["flex items-center justify-center","grid md:grid-cols-3","py-20 / py-24 sections"]
Technology context
5Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.
-
Hosting / CDN hint context 0 ptsTECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology
The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["Vercel response header","Cloudflare response header","Server: Cloudflare"]
-
Uses Next.js context 0 ptsTECH_NEXT · technology
The static HTML suggests Next.js. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["asset path: /_next/static/chunks/6a934d13-d9077b3929944edb.js","App Router flight data"]
-
Uses React context 0 ptsTECH_REACT · technology
The static HTML suggests React. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["Next.js runtime (React based)","React runtime bootstrap in inline script"]
-
Uses shadcn/ui or Radix UI context 0 ptsTECH_SHADCN_RADIX · technology
The static HTML suggests shadcn/ui or Radix UI. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["shadcn/ui theme tokens: bg-background, text-foreground, bg-card"]
-
Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 ptsTECH_TAILWIND · technology
The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["263 distinct Tailwind-style utility classes","tailwindcss banner in CSS"]
Limitations of this scan
1-
Only a common tech stack context 0 ptsLIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint
Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.
- technologies:
- ["TECH_NEXT","TECH_REACT","TECH_SHADCN_RADIX","TECH_TAILWIND"]
Is this your website? Request removal