claude.com
AI signal score
0/ 100
Insufficient evidence
This is an experimental heuristic score, not proof of how a site was made. A score of 0 means no relevant signals were detected — not that the site is human-coded.
- Last checked
- (2 hours ago)
AI-related evidence
0No AI-related patterns matched. That's not proof either way.
Technology context
3Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.
-
Hosting / CDN hint context 0 ptsTECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology
The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["Cloudflare response header","Server: Cloudflare"]
-
Uses Next.js context 0 ptsTECH_NEXT · technology
The static HTML suggests Next.js. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["asset path: /_next/static/chunks/356c50710ec64383.js","App Router flight data"]
-
Uses React context 0 ptsTECH_REACT · technology
The static HTML suggests React. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.
- signals:
- ["Next.js runtime (React based)","React runtime bootstrap in inline script"]
Limitations of this scan
2-
Only a common tech stack context 0 ptsLIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint
Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.
- technologies:
- ["TECH_NEXT","TECH_REACT"]
-
Too little evidence context 0 ptsLIMIT_TOO_LITTLE_EVIDENCE · constraint
There was too little to analyze, or no specific signal matched. This does not mean the site was written by hand; it only means the public homepage gives no usable evidence either way.
- elements:
- 1281
- scoring_signals:
- 0
- visible_text_chars:
- 6421