careem.com

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

• Popular gradient styling weak +2 pts
  UI_GENERIC_GRADIENT · design

  The page uses popular gradient styles (for example purple-to-blue or gradient text). They often appear in generated designs but are a long-standing design trend, so this is only a weak hint.

  signals:

  ["purple/indigo linear-gradients in CSS"]

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

• Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
  TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

  The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["Amazon CloudFront response header"]

• Uses Tailwind CSS context 0 pts
  TECH_TAILWIND · technology

  The static HTML suggests Tailwind CSS. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["208 distinct Tailwind-style utility classes","tailwindcss banner in CSS"]

• Uses Vue / Nuxt context 0 pts
  TECH_VUE · technology

  The static HTML suggests Vue / Nuxt. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

  signals:

  ["scoped-style data-v-* attributes","Nuxt asset path: /_nuxt/C3zZ-w6R.js","Nuxt state script"]

• Only a common tech stack context 0 pts
  LIMIT_GENERIC_TECH · constraint

  Only common technologies were detected, with no builder-specific marker. Frameworks such as React, Tailwind or shadcn/ui are used by countless hand-written sites and are not evidence of AI generation.

  technologies:

  ["TECH_TAILWIND","TECH_VUE"]