beam.win

AI signal score

7/ 100

Weak hints only

This is an experimental heuristic score, not proof of how a site was made.

Last checked
(2 hours ago)
Rescan available in 21 hours 56 minutes

AI-related evidence

4

Design, copy and structure patterns. These are weak, capped signals — plenty of hand-made sites share them.

  • Decorative numbered labels weak +2 pts
    COPY_NUMBERED_LABELS · content

    The page uses decorative numbered labels like 01 / 02 / 03. Generated designs use them often, but so do many designers, so this is only a weak hint.

    labels:
    ["01","02","03","04","05"]
  • Blur / glass effects weak +2 pts
    UI_BLUR_GLASS · design

    The markup combines backdrop blur with translucent backgrounds. Generated pages use this often, but so do many designers, so it is only a weak hint.

    css_backdrop_filter:
    true
    blur_translucent_elements:
    0
  • Uniform section rhythm weak +2 pts
    UI_SAME_SECTION_RHYTHM · design

    Many page sections repeat nearly identical markup. Generated landing pages often do this, but so does any consistent component-based design, so this is only a weak hint.

    sections:
    5
    largest_repeated_group:
    5
  • Repeated rounded cards with shadows weak +1 pt
    UI_REPEATED_ROUNDED_CARDS · design

    The markup repeats rounded "card" elements with shadows or borders. This pattern is common in generated landing pages but equally common in hand-made and template sites, so it is only a weak hint.

    css_rules:
    16
    card_like_elements:
    0

Technology context

1

Frameworks, libraries and hosting we noticed. Context only — popular tools are not evidence of AI generation and add 0 points.

  • Hosting / CDN hint context 0 pts
    TECH_HOSTING_HINT · technology

    The static HTML suggests a known hosting / CDN provider. This is technology context only and adds no points: it is common in both hand-written and generated sites.

    signals:
    ["Vercel response header","Server: Vercel"]

Is this your website? Request removal